Legal Opinion

American Southern National Bank v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 1, 1916PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court' (■Common Pleas Branch, Third Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

In 1906, the George Alexander & Company hank was duly incorporated as a hanking institution with its principal office and place of business at Paris, Ky., and had a, capital of $40,000.00, divided into shares of $100.00 each; and by its charter, which was executed on the 11th day of April of that year, it was authorized to engage in and conduct a general hanking business in the State of Kentucky. Since that time its charter has been amended to the extent of changing its name to “George Alexander & Company State Bank.” In all other respects its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens Trust & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Cartmell v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Bell & Coggeshall Co. v. Kentucky Glass Works Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Citizens Bank v. Bank of WaddyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Milner v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Federal Chemical Co. v. PaddockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Williams v. Denny, Banking CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API