Legal Opinion

Forbes v. City of Ashland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 25, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

The city of Ashland, Ky., is one of the second class, and its legislative department enacted the necessary ordinances to improve certain designated streets in the city at the expense of the abutting property owners. Specifications for the work were prepared and advertisements for bids were made, all according to law. Among the bids submitted was one by the appellants M. I. Forbes, J. W. Bosley, and George Hunt, composing the partnership of Hunt-Forbes Construction Company, and which was ascertained by the city authorities to be the lowest and best…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Westerfield-Bonte Co. v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. City of Louisville v. BitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Roten v. TesdellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Kentucky Association Highway Contractors v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. West American Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  3. Burton v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Belcher v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. York v. PETZL AMERICA, INC.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API