Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Jill Marie Zetterwall

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 2024No. a231525Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is nonprecedential except as provided by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(c). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A23-1525 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jill Marie Zetterwall, Appellant. Filed June 10, 2024 Affirmed Frisch, Judge Hennepin County District Court File No. 27-CR-22-15379 Keith Ellison, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Mary F. Moriarty, Hennepin County Attorney, Nicole Cornale, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondent) Bruce Rivers, Rivers Law Firm, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellant) Considered and decided by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. BertschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API