Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Bailey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1890No. 13,757PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, C. J

This was an action by Bailey against the board of commissioners of Carroll county to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him in *47falling from a bridge, which it is charged had negligently-been suffered to become and remain out of repair, and in a dangerous condition. The controlling question is, whether or not the structure, or place from which the plaintiff fell, was a bridge within the meaning of the statute, which requires the board of commissioners of each county to cause all the bridges therein to be kept in repair. The facts relating to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v. Hartford & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  4. Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Board of Commissioners v. MutchlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Board of Commissioners v. NicholsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Board of Commissioners v. CastetterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Indiana Trust Co. v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API