Iman v. Southern Pacific Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
The appellants (plaintiffs in the trial court) brought this action under the Declaratory Judgments Act, A.R.S. § 12— 1831 et seq., seeking to have declared unconstitutional the Railroad Anti-Featherbedding Law of 1964. This law, which became effective December 3, 1964, was enacted by the electors of the State of Arizona through initiative petition submitted for their approval or rejection at the general election held on November 3, 1964. (This initiative measure is hereinafter referred to as Proposition 200.) 1 ****From a judgment of dismissal, the plaintiffs appealed.
The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Allen v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Citizens' Committee for the Recall of Williams v. MarstonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.