Blehm v. Hanzek
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
The bill was filed to vacate a judgment for $115 and costs of $14.30, rendered against plaintiff in justice’s court, and for injunction to restrain enforcement of the judgment in any manner. Plaintiff had decree.
A 10-day summons was issued and return of personal service made. However, a recital appears in the justice’s docket, as of the return day, that “defendant not appearing it was found that the summons had been left with defendant’s wife. ’ ’ Thereupon a new summons, returnable in five days, was issued. It was personally served’ and, on the return day, defendant not appearing, judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Mactavish v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Garey v. Morley BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Wilcke v. DurossMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartsema v. Addison Coal & Coke Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Smith v. Pontiac Citizens Loan & Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940