Legal Opinion

Blehm v. Hanzek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 106, Calendar No. 38,451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

The bill was filed to vacate a judgment for $115 and costs of $14.30, rendered against plaintiff in justice’s court, and for injunction to restrain enforcement of the judgment in any manner. Plaintiff had decree.

A 10-day summons was issued and return of personal service made. However, a recital appears in the justice’s docket, as of the return day, that “defendant not appearing it was found that the summons had been left with defendant’s wife. ’ ’ Thereupon a new summons, returnable in five days, was issued. It was personally served’ and, on the return day, defendant not appearing, judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Mactavish v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Garey v. Morley BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Wilcke v. DurossMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartsema v. Addison Coal & Coke Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Smith v. Pontiac Citizens Loan & Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API