Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1930No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendant was convicted on a charge of driving an automobile forty miles per hour in a twenty-mile zone, and appeals from the judgment. The complaint, which was-in substantially the language just used in stating it, is inartificially drawn, but no point is made on this appeal in regard to it, and we proceed on the assumption that it is sufficient.

All of the points specified as grounds of appeal resolve themselves into the contention that the trial court did not follow the provisions of section 155 of the California Vehicle Act, as amended in 1929, and for that reason it had no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Roberts v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Fleming v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. TyreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. People v. HardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. People v. HalopoffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  3. People v. SterrittAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  4. People v. SterrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API