Legal Opinion

People v. Sterritt

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 22, 1976No. Crim. A. No. 14381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLE, Acting P. J.—

We decided in People v. Halopoff (1976) 60 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 [131 Cal.Rptr. 531], that in the trial of speeding cases where radar is involved “it is incumbent upon the People, without request from the defendant, to disclose to the court and to the defendant that radar is involved and further, where such is the case, to demonstrate the existence of the engineering and traffic survey required by section 40802, subdivision (b) [of the Vehicle Code].” (60 Cal.App.3d Supp. at p. 5.) In the present matter we hold that Halopoff is to be applied retroactively to cases whose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. HalopoffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  3. People v. HerediaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. SterrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1986
  3. People v. GouletAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992
  4. People v. StoneAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1987
  5. People v. ConzelmanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API