Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sandmann v. Petron

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1987No. C0-87-23PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Stephen T. Petron (Petron), a chiropractor, petitioned for a writ of prohibition to prevent the enforcement of a district court order subjecting him to a deposition prior to the commencement of a medical malpractice complaint. The writ will issue.

Douglas Sandmann (Sandmann) brought a special proceeding in the Brown County District Court seeking an order under Rule 27 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure to enable him to depose Petron in order to obtain information Sandmann believed necessary to enable a medical consultant to ascertain whether or not Petron was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. In re BolandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  3. In Re Gurnsey's PetitionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
  4. In re North CarolinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  5. In re the Petition of Gary Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petition of Hall by and Through HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. In re SitterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Harmon v. Mercy HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Williams v. EngenAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Harmon v. Mercy HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API