Legal Opinion
In re Sitter
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 26, 1996No. Civ. No. 3-95-MC73PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Petition of Phyllis Sitter (“Sitter”) for leave to conduct discovexy, under Rule 27, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in advance of filing a Summons and Complaint.
A Hearing on the Petition was conducted on February 22, 1996, at which time Sitter appeared by Michael L. Zenor, Esq., and the Mayo Clinic appeared, in opposition, by William…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- City of Huntington, West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United States of America and the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In the Matter of the Application of Deiulemar Compagnia Di Navigazione S.P.A. For the Perpetuation of Certain Evidence v. M/v Allegra v. Pacific Eternity, S.A. Golden Union Shipping Co. S.A., Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Deiulemar Compagnia Di Navigazione v. M/V AllegraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- In re StorckDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Millen v. Mayo FoundationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.