Legal Opinion

Croxen v. Salhus

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1985No. C2-85-973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Respondent sued appellant in conciliation court for property damage she incurred following a two-car collision between the parties. The court found appellant 100% negligent and awarded respondent her property damages. Appellant removed the action to district court where she was again found 100% negligent. Salhus appeals to this court arguing the trial court failed to apply the comparative negligencé law and its judgment was not supported by the evidence. Respondent moves for an award of fees and expenses under R. 138, Minn. R. App. Pro. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 10, 1984,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bohnen v. GorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Johnson v. MancilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Cooper v. FriesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Alden Wells Veterinarian Clinics, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Fletcher v. SellnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zirnhelt v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API