Legal Opinion

Common Cause v. Bolger

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 11, 1980No. Civ. 1887-73PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

PRATT, District Judge.

This action challenges the constitutionality of certain portions of the congressional franking statute, 39 U.S.C. § 3210 (1976 ed.). Plaintiffs, whose members include more than fifty candidates challenging incumbent members of Congress for election, contend that the statute is unconstitutional on its face and violates their First and Fifth Amendment rights by subsidizing the election of incumbent congressmen but not of challengers. The defendants, the intervenor and the amicus curiae have moved to dismiss contending that plaintiffs lack standing, that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kardules v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Fulani v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. Colorado Taxpayers Union, Inc. v. RomerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Natural Law Party of the United States v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Holden v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API