Legal Opinion
Ex Parte McKinney
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 21, 1987No. 86-324PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
On January 20, 1987, the petition for mandamus was denied, without opinion. See 514 So.2d 350 (Ala. 1987). The petitioner has filed an application for rehearing.
This petition for writ of mandamus involves a question of whether a dispute was subject to arbitration under the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act. In order to answer that question, we must determine whether there was a valid enforceable arbitration agreement that applied to the dispute, and whether the party moving for arbitration had waived its right to have the controversy arbitrated because it…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Companion Life Ins. Co. v. Whitesell Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Georgia Power Co. v. PartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Thompson v. Skipper Real Estate CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.