Fraker v. CulLum
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Error from Sedgwick District Court. All necessary facts and proceedings are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The district court, at the’ September Term, 1877, gave judgment in favor of H. B. Cullum, as receiver of the First National Bank, of Wichita, plaintiff, and against W. C. Fraker, defendant, for the sum of $847.50, and costs. Fraker, claiming that judgment ought to have been rendered for, instead of against him, brings the case here for reversal of the judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The principal question involyed in this case is with reference to the effect to be given to certain alterations made in a certain promissory note. The facts of the case seem to be substantially as follows:
In January, 1875, W. C. Fraker executed to J. C. Fraker a certain promissory note for $4,862.40, dated January 23, 1875, due in six months after date, and drawing interest from maturity at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum. This note was executed by W. C. Fraker without any consideration to him, and merely as an accommodation to his…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Baron v. LymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Howell v. FloraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Fraker v. LittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Wyant v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. LauberCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.