Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Lauber

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 14, 1898No. 173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Edwards district court'; S. W. Yandivert, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, P. J. :

This action.was brought in the district court of Edwards county by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error, Frank Lauber and Mathias Lauber, to recover the amount claimed to be due upon a promissory note. One of the defenses set up by the defendants was that the date of the note had been changed from December 1, 1896, to December 20, 1896. The court gave the jury the following instruction :

“If you believe from a preponderance of all the evidence in this case that the note in suit was originally dated December 1, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Fraker v. CulLumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Seaton v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Baron v. LymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API