Gugel v. Neitzel
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
This is a bill to rescind, an exchange of real estate between plaintiffs and defendant Neitzel upon the ground of fraud, consisting of misrepresentations of value. Rescission having become impossible, plaintiffs now ask money damages from de fendants Neitzel and Golner only. The circuit court entered a decree dismissing the bill. We find ourselves unable to agree with that result, as we think the record discloses a case of intentional fraud.
Plaintiffs are laboring folks without business experience except that, for a year, they had once conducted a small confectionery store, and, within five…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Kefuss v. WhitleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Maxted v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Yanelli v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Steele v. BanningaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mettetal v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Boss v. TomarasMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Poloms v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Hubert v. JoslinMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Horton v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.