Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Penobscot Valley Hospital

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 8, 1988PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

Plaintiff, Mark Mueller, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Penobscot County, in favor of the defendants, Penob-scot Valley Hospital and Francis P. Kirley. On appeal plaintiff argues that the Superi- or Court erred in granting summary judgment based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Maine Tort Claims Act’s 180-day notice provision (14 M.R.S.A. § 8107 (1980)) because the provision is inapplicable to his tort action against defendant Kirley and to his claims against both defendants for breach of contract and deprivation of liberty under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rippett v. BemisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. American Legacy Foundation v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  3. Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  4. Houde v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Cardente v. Fleet Bank of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API