Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. White

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendants built a house on a lot which is subject to a restrictive covenant against the construction thereon of a house of more than one and one-half stories. The obvious purpose of the covenant was to protect the view from an adjacent dominant uphill lot occupied by plaintiffs’ home. Plaintiffs brought this action for damages, claiming defendants breached the restrictive covenant by building a house of more than one and one-half stories, thereby destroying plaintiffs’ view. Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

The sole issue on appeal is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alloway v. MoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Drulard v. LeTourneauOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API