Legal Opinion
Richards v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 15, 1912No. 7120PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Rrror to Denver County Court. — Hon. John R. Dixon, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bairey
The action was upon a promissory note. There were separate amended answers by the defendants, practically the same both in phrase and substance. By these amended answers the execution and delivery of the note is admitted. By paragraph 5 of the first defense, in each answer, this is alleged :
“This defendant denies that the said note has not been paid; she denies that there is now due or owing- thereon the sum of $400.00 or any other amount of money whatsoever, either as principal or interest thereon, but on the contrary in this behalf this defendant alleges that the said note, including the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Juilliard v. . ChaffeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Rice v. BushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Wakeley v. NicholasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
- Kimber v. Gunnell Gold Min. & Mill. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Harris v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Childers v. BairdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Eppich v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Kingsbury v. VreelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Williams v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Wallace v. CollierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.