Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Collier

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1915No. 7901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Huerfano District Court. Hon. Henry Hunter, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

delivered the opinion of the court. ■

The plaintiff in error is a stockholder in The Denver Copper Mining and Leasing Company, and brings this action as such, alleging one of the recognized reasons, and makes it a party defendant. The amended complaint is voluminous. We shall not attempt to analyze it. Among other things, it charges, in substance, that the defendants, Collier and Curtis, entered into a conspiracy, the purpose *145of which was to vest the title to certain coal lands in the defendant, The United States Fuel Company, and to cause the stock of that company to be issued to Collier as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Bohm v. BohmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. Harris v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Richards v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Williams v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Ceres Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  2. Reagan v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Lamon v. ZampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Jackisch v. QuineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Lamon v. ZampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API