Legal Opinion

Harding v. San Saba Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1929No. 7293PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, C. j.

The bank (appellee) sued. Crain as principal and Johnson and Sloan as sureties on two promissory notes, and Harding and Evans for converting certain pecans which they had purchased from Crain, and upon which the bank claimed a chattel mortgage to secure the notes. Johnson and Sloan admitted plaintiff’s cause of action, but asked that the judgment be first satisfied through the liability of Harding and Evans as conversioners of the mortgaged property. Harding and Evans (appellants) defended on two grounds; (1) That the mortgage was void because of indefiniteness of description…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cranfill v. Swann Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Melasky v. JarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Medlin v. HambrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Woodson v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. East Central Fruit Growers Production Credit Ass'n v. ZuritskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. McKeever v. Brooks-Davis ChevroLet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Radford v. Bacon Securities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Fritz Motor Co. v. GabertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Hopkins v. HemsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API