Legal Opinion

Fritz Motor Co. v. Gabert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1931No. 12472PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

M. Gabert, doing business in the city of Fort Worth, was employed by Johnnie Pringleto do certain necessary repair work on an automobile owned by Pringle, and the value of the work so done by Gabert was $173.45. At the time the work was done, the Fritz Motor Company held a chattel mortgage on the car to secure the payment of 12 promissory notes executed by Pringle and Pat Sherman, aggregating the sum of $513.32, which was past due. Before Gabert did the repair work, he had notice of such mortgage by the prior filing thereof in the chattel mortgage records of Tarrant county, and also by actual…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Case v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. American Type Founders Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McBride v. BeakleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Cook v. WilmethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. MOTOR TRUCK SALES COMPANY v. HauckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Lindsey v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API