Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Lockhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1986No. 86-10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this motion appellant, an inmate of the Arkansas Department of Correction, requests appointment of counsel to represent him in the appeal of the denial of a civil motion for declaratory judgment against the Director of the Department of Correction. He bases his motion for counsel on the unavailability of typewriters at the prison, which precludes his submitting a typed brief as required by our rules.

The motion is denied. The appeal is civil in nature, and there is no absolute right to counsel in a civil action. Virgin v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 92, 702 S.W.2d 9 (1986).

If the lack of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Virgin v. AL LOCKHARTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Cash v. State Board of Pardons & ParolesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Miner v. FurmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Burns v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Coble v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API