Legal Opinion

Virgin v. AL LOCKHART

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1986No. 85-223PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant who is an inmate of the Arkansas Department of Correction sought a writ of mandamus from the circuit court to compel the Department to reassess his parole eligibility status. The circuit court denied the petition and the record has now been lodged on appeal. We denied appellant’s first motion for appointment of counsel in this appeal because he stated no grounds. He has filed a motion to reconsider, contending that he has a right to counsel.

In criminal cases the accused has a constitutional right to counsel at trial. There is no corresponding right to counsel in a postconviction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerald D. Peterson v. Isadore NadlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. Dyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Johnson v. TeasdaleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Howard v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Patterson v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Biggs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Hayes v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API