Legal Opinion

Cash v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1989No. 88-298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Jerry Cash, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, has petitioned this court to order the State of Arkansas to reproduce the appellant’s abstract and brief on appeal. This case is civil in nature and there is no duty on the part of the state to provide a civil litigant with special materials, assistance, or printing. We held held a number of times that such things will be granted in a civil case only upon a showing of substantial merit. Patterson v. Smith, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986); Williams v. State, 289 Ark. 567, 712 S.W.2d 924 (1986); Hayes v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 419, 706 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Patterson v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Hayes v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Le v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Slaton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Hatchett v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API