Legal Opinion

Haynes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 6, 2002No. 00-575 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff, Brenda Shelton Haynes, appearing pro se, alleges breach of a mortgage contract by defendant, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), entitling her to $15,000 in damages. Complaint (Compl.) H 2, at 1, 3. This matter is before the court pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Def.’s SJM) filed February 26, 2001, arguing that the Complaint raises no genuine issues of material fact and that defendant is therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

For the following reasons, defendant’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivera Agredano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Haynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API