Haynes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, Brenda Shelton Haynes, appearing pro se, claims that she is entitled to damages resulting from the federal government’s breach of a mortgage contract. Complaint ¶ 2. The court has before it Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Def.’s Mot.) on the issue of damages. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT for defendant.
I. Background1
James F. Freeman, plaintiffs father, and Henry Davis (collectively referred to as “borrowers”) entered into a twenty-year mortgage…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dunn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.