Legal Opinion

Swanks v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 18, 1999No. 98-7115PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

In Swanks v. WMATA, 116 F.3d 582, 583 (D.C.Cir.1997) (“Stvanks /”), the court held that receipt of disability benefits under the Social Security Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 423 (1994), did not bar recovery under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (1994), et seq., and remanded the case to the district court for a jury to determine whether the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) had discriminated against Michael Swanks. See 116 F.3d at 587-88. Thereafter a jury found for WMATA on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Curry v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Haynes, Charles v. Williams, AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. McGill, Thu v. Munoz, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Tracey Lust v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API