State v. Finlay
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction, following a stipulated facts trial, of burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, and theft in the first degree, ORS 164.055. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress and argues, inter alia, that one of the investigating officers effected an unlawful seizure and search in ordering defendant to get out of his car and then viewing the car’s interior through the open door, which, in turn, yielded evidence of the crimes. We reverse and remand.
Except as specifically noted, the following facts are uncontroverted. At about…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RhodesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. TurechekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. DoradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020