Riegel v. Lyerly
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The widow’s assertion of absolute ownership calls for answers to these questions: (1) Does the rule in Shelley’s case or a similar rule apply to the disposition of personal property in this State? (2) If so, does the widow, by Item 4 of the Riegel will, acquire absolute ownership in one-third of the residuary estate?
The law in this State, settled by a uniform line of decisions, is that a grant, devise or bequest to A for life, remainder in fee or absolutely to the heirs-at-law of A vests A with an estate in fee simple or absolute unless it is made to appear from other portions of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bond v. Midstates Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Payne v. SaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1839
- Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Wilkinson v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ray v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Wright v. VadenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Carolina Water Service, Inc. v. Town of Pine Knoll ShoresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Society National Bank v. JacobsonOhio Supreme Court · 1990