Legal Opinion

Riegel v. Lyerly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 23, 1965No. 282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The widow’s assertion of absolute ownership calls for answers to these questions: (1) Does the rule in Shelley’s case or a similar rule apply to the disposition of personal property in this State? (2) If so, does the widow, by Item 4 of the Riegel will, acquire absolute ownership in one-third of the residuary estate?

The law in this State, settled by a uniform line of decisions, is that a grant, devise or bequest to A for life, remainder in fee or absolutely to the heirs-at-law of A vests A with an estate in fee simple or absolute unless it is made to appear from other portions of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bond v. Midstates Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Payne v. SaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1839
  4. Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Wilkinson v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ray v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Wright v. VadenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Carolina Water Service, Inc. v. Town of Pine Knoll ShoresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Society National Bank v. JacobsonOhio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API