Legal Opinion

Miller v. Wellman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error- to Kent. (Grove, J.) Trespass to lands. Plaintiff Irings error. The facts are stated in the i pinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

In 1881 plaintiff purchased of Robinson, Letellier & Co., on a land contract, the south half of north half of *354north-east quarter of section 5, township of Tyrone, Kent county, Michigan, and in 1888 obtained a deed thereof.

On the same day defendant purchased, by like contract from the same parties, the north half of north half of northeast quarter of the same section.

Plaintiff and defendant each at once went into possession of the land he supposed belonged to him, and continued in possession thereof to the time of the commencement of this suit.

The boundary line between the two parcels of land…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Isle Royale Mining Co. v. HertinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Skeels v. StarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oregon & California Railroad v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bradford v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Newcomb v. LoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Campbell v. Rose Street Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fisher v. NaysmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API