Legal Opinion

Skeels v. Starrett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This action was brought to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by the plaintiff in consequence of certain trespasses committed by the defendant on lands belonging to plaintiff, in the county of Muskegon, on and subsequent to May 1, 1882. The declaration contained two counts. One was the ordinary count in trespass, and the other a count under the statute, and upon which the plaintiff recovered.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that he was the owner of the land in question; that the defendant entered upon the lands, and in 1882 cut down trees, converted them into saw-logs, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Dorrity v. RussellThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Oregon & California Railroad v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Miller v. WellmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gordon v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API