Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1917No. Calendar No. 27,710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus by Orlando F. Barnes, George B. Horton and Thomas D. Kearney, Board of State Tax Commissioners, and another, against the Board of 'Supervisors of Wayne County to compel said respondent to convene and apportion the State and county taxes in accordance with an order of said Board of State Tax Commissioners.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant board to convene and apportion the State and county taxes in the several assessing districts of the county of Wayne in accordance with the equalization report and order made by the plaintiff board.

It appears that on October 26, 1916, the defendant board made an examination of assessment rolls of the townships and cities in the county of Wayne for the purposes of equalization and equalized the real estate, and stated the aggregate valuations of the taxable real property therein, the result of which appears in an exhibit attached…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stockle v. SilsbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Peninsula Iron & Lumber Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Barnes v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Smith v. CrittendenMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Attorney General v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Erie Township v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Wallace v. Hughes Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API