Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Noel

Opinion of the court by

Mr. Justice Woods.

It is claimed that the Circuit Court erred :(1). In refusing to arrest the judgment; (2), in refusing to render judgment for the defendant for the costs on the special findings of the jury; (8), in refusing the appellant a new trial.

First, theD, as to the motion in arrest of judgment. The second paragraph of the complaint, which alone remains in the record, is substantially as follows:

*15That on or about the first day of February, 1871, the plaintiff haulpd to the track of the defendant three hundred cords of wood, which defendant had agreed with…