Madison v. Haynes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
This is a dispute as to the boundary between two lots in a platted residential subdivision.
Plaintiffs owned Lot 30 and defendants owned Lot 7, per plat reference, and there is no issue as concerns their ownership or title to such lots. Each lot was platted with a width of 50' and a depth of lOO. The lots abutted on the rear, having a common rear *853lot line across their 50' width. Lot 7 fronted on Lucky Street and Lot 30 fronted on Booker Street, The plat appeared as follows:
The problem arose when it was discovered that, due to original plat error, the distance between Lucky Street…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pereles v. MagoonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Pompano Beach v. BeattyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- City of Jacksonville v. BrowardSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brinson v. ShimpDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State, Department of Transportation v. BorsjeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990