Legal Opinion

City of Jacksonville v. Broward

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 16, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

This controversy arises over the distribution of an excess found to exist in the J. Fenwich and S. Wilson Grants long after the plat thereof was executed and placed of record. The bill of complaint filed by appellant, City of Jacksonville, prays that it be decreed to be the owner in fee of Lot “N” of the subdivision of the J. Fenwich and S. Wilson Grants, Sections 44, 45 and 47, Township One, South Ranges 26 and 27, as' shown by the plat of said subdivision recorded in Plat Book One, page 8, of the former public records of Duval County, as the said Lot “N” would líe if the excess in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pereles v. MagoonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Coppin v. MansonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Booth v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. James v. DrewMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Porter v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Pompano Beach v. BeattyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Madison v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Petryni v. DentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API