Legal Opinion
Brinson v. Shimp
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 21, 1990No. 89-02474PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
The predecessors in title to the Shimps sued the predecessors in title to the Brinsons in this dispute over the correct boundary between their respective properties in the R.E. Gause Subdivision in Palm Harbor, Florida. The Shimps and the Brin-sons were ultimately substituted as the litigants. At one point all property owners in the subdivision were joined in the litigation but because this is an action in ejectment the trial court correctly dismissed all parties whose property did not abut the disputed footage. Stark v. Marshall, 67 So.2d 235 (Fla.1953); Barba Investment Co. v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tyson v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Stark v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- City of Pompano Beach v. BeattyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Barba Inv. Co. v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Madison v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Petryni v. DentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Force v. AllisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991