Rieck v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
For the third1 time in two years, we are urged to distinguish away a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. We make no criticism of that. The principle of stare decisis 2 clearly does not go to the length of preclusion from persuasion. It may be, nevertheless, a rule of sufficient vitality to cause avoidance of directness. The cases indicate a tendency toward limitation to the “particular facts” rather than an express overruling. 3 This emphasis on “particular facts” undoubtedly encourages, however, a frantic search for differences of detail.
The principal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BrowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.