Legal Opinion

Kline v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 23, 1992No. CIV 3-90-0808PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JORDAN, District Judge.

This civil action is before the Court for consideration of the parties’ opposing mo tions for partial summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 [docs. 6 and 14] on the issue whether the plaintiffs job and that of another employee of the defendant Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) should have been combined into one competitive level for the purpose of a reduction in force (RIF) in which the plaintiff lost his job. The Court heard the arguments of counsel in November, 1991, and is now ready to render its decision. For the reasons stated in this Memorandum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Riley E. Jackson v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Barry L. Hale and Judson B. Hudson v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Peter D. Borsari v. Federal Aviation Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Robert S. Dunning v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ritland v. Arizona State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API