Clopton v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMFORD, Judge.
The defendant was charged by affidavit that he did bet at a game of cards or dice, or some device or substitute for cards or dice, at a tavern, inn, or in a public house, highway, or some other public place, or at an outhouse where people resorted.
The evidence for the State tended to prove that the place where the game of cards was being played was in the private residence of one of the players. The parties engaged in the game of cards or dice, etc., were friends and neighbors. There was no . evidence that the house where the playing was done was any one of the places…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stafford v. Colonial Mortgage & Bond Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Browne v. GigerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Johnstone v. O'RearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calvert Fire Insurance Company v. PhillipsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962