Legal Opinion

Skinner v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From tbe Criminal Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. H. C. Wiley, as special judge. cited Dale v. State, 27 Ala. 31; Wilson v. State, 31 Ala. 371. • cited Goehr cm v. State, 30 Ala. 542; Smith v. State, 52 Ala. 384; Bentley v. State, 32 Ala. 596; Caiothorn v. State, 63 Ala. 157; Summers v. State, 70 Ala. 16; Gilliam v. State, 71 Ala. 10; Wren v. State, 70 Ala. 1.

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

Appellant was convicted, in the Criminal Court of Pike county, of the offense of betting at a game played with dice in a public house, under section 4057 of Code of 1886. A jury not having been demanded, as provided by the act establishing the Criminal Court, the facts were properly triable by the presiding judge. In such case, his finding of fact will not be reversed on appeal, unless so *106clearly erroneous that the verdict o£ a jury would be set aside by the trial court, if rendered on the same testimony. Jacques v. Horton, 76 Ala. 238; Gilliam v. State, 71 Ala. 10; Nooe v. Garner, 70 Ala.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jaques v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Nooe's v. Garner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. Hardy & Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Gilliam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Dodd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Odom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API