Legal Opinion

Stafford v. Colonial Mortgage & Bond Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1930No. 6 Div. 682PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit was by landlord against tenant to recover a monthly instalment of rent.

The defense was rescission of the rental contract for fraud in its procurement.

The cause was tried without a jury. The trial judge made a special finding of facts under Code 1923, § 9500.

Appellee makes the point that such finding and judgment are not subject to review because the bill of exceptions shows no exception reserved thereto.

The case of Johnstone et al. v. O’Rear et al., 220 Ala. 219, 124 So. 743, relied .upon on this point, has been overruled by the later case of Browne v. Giger, ante, p. 176, 128 So.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. BralySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Elliott v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Hunt v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Nelson v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Shepherd v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Stanard Tilton Milling Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. PUTMAN CONST. & REALTY CO., INC. v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API