Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Department of Taxes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 26, 2001No. 00-524PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taxpayers appeal a superior court decision granting State of Vermont Department of Taxes’ Rule 60(b) motion and upholding the Commissioner’s decision that taxpayers are liable for land gains and property transfer taxes pursuant to 32 V.S.A. §§ 9602 and 10006. On.appeal, taxpayers argue the superior court: (1) abused its discretion in finding that the elements of estoppel were not met; (2) abused its discretion under Rule 60(b); (3) failed to make adequate findings for this Court to review; and (4) erred in finding taxpayers liable for land gains tax. We affirm.

This case arises from facts we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Wesco, Inc. v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Murphy v. Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Beecher v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Altman v. AltmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Taxes v. MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Bidgood v. Town of CavendishSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API