Legal Opinion

United States v. Conquest

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1957No. Crim. No. 18770PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, District Judge.

The defendant, Sylvanus Conquest, doing business as Connie’s Express, was charged in 13 counts of an information with operating as a contract carrier of property by motor vehicle in interstate commerce without a permit issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission authorizing him to engage in such business — all in violation of Title 49 U.S. C.A. § 309(a) 1 and § 322(a).2

Westmoreland Metal Mfg. Co., a corporation, was charged with aiding and abetting the unlawful operation of defendant Conquest. Defendant Westmoreland entered a plea of nolo contendere, and at the same…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Korte v. New York, N. H. & H. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. United States v. Contract Steel Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AlaimoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API