United States v. Conquest
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
The defendant, Sylvanus Conquest, doing business as Connie’s Express, was charged in 13 counts of an information with operating as a contract carrier of property by motor vehicle in interstate commerce without a permit issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission authorizing him to engage in such business — all in violation of Title 49 U.S. C.A. § 309(a) 1 and § 322(a).2
Westmoreland Metal Mfg. Co., a corporation, was charged with aiding and abetting the unlawful operation of defendant Conquest. Defendant Westmoreland entered a plea of nolo contendere, and at the same…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Korte v. New York, N. H. & H. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Contract Steel Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. AlaimoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961