Legal Opinion

Iag Federal Credit Union v. Laterman

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-P-1293PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The plaintiff (bank) filed an action in the Superior Court to recover the balance due on two promissory notes signed by the defendants. After filing the action, the bank sent notice of its intent to foreclose the mortgage to Joseph Comperchio, sole mortgagor of record and trustee of the property that had been granted as security for these loans. *117No notice of intent to foreclose was sent to the defendants. The bank then proceeded to foreclose the mortgage under the power of sale contained in the mortgage. After applying the foreclosure sale proceeds to the monies owed on the two notes, a judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seronick v. LEVY SCHONFELDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  2. Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Palumbo v. AudetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Wornat Development Corp. v. VakalisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bead Portfolio, LLC v. FollayttarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. JER SKW Services, Inc. v. GoldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hopping Brook TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  4. Massachusetts Co. v. ChristensenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. BankBoston, N.A. v. YodiceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API