Legal Opinion

Borough of Dickson City v. Patrick Outdoor Media, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1985No. Appeal, No. 375 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Colins,

In this appeal, we must decide whether the Borough of Dickson City (Borough) may prohibit the erection of “off-site” advertising billboards throughout the . entire Borough and limit the size of advertising signs to one hundred square feet.

The matter sub judice stems from a controversy involving the Borough’s zoning ordinance. The pertinent sections are as follows:

5.850 Signs

Signs may be erected and maintained only when in compliance with the following provisions:

5.852 Signs in “C” and “M” Districts.

Business signs shall be permitted as follows:(a) Sise of Signs. No sign…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Daikeler v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Montgomery TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Ridgeview Associates v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Township of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. J.B. Steven, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Township of Exeter v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF EXETER TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. In re Appeal of Autohaus Lancaster Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API