Legal Opinion
Daikeler v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Montgomery Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1971No. Civil Action—Law, No. 68-12380PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
This Court by virtue of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act of 1970 has before it an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which sustained the Montgomery TownsMp Board of Adjustment.
The contention' advanced by appellants is that an' ordinance which purports to regulate the use of off-premises advertising signs in a townsMp but does in fact arbitrarily and unreasonably prohibit the use is-therefore unconstitutional. We agree.
Appellants, a partnersMp doing business as 'Dai-keler Associates, operate a service station and automotive center (repair…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bryan v. City of ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Liggett's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Township of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Lower Providence Township v. FordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- COMMONWEALTH v. BUCKS COUNTYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Shomo v. Derry BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.