Legal Opinion

Kratz Et Vir v. American Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1948No. Appeal, 165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

In the absence of special circumstances, the retail vendor of an article of merchandise * in common and general use, purchased by him in the usual course of trade and business from a reputable manufacturer or dealer, and resold by him in its original sealed package or container labelled with proper warnings and directions as to use, is not liable to a customer for injuries caused by some latent defect in the article. This principle of law completely negatives plaintiffs’ alleged cause of action in the present case.

The complaint avers that the wife plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co. v. McMath's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. West v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Clement v. RommeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Belcher v. Goff Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMeekin v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. Phillips v. Whelan Drug Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API