Legal Opinion
Pinter v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 18, 2011No. 10-3789-cvUnpublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendants-appellants (jointly, “defendants”) bring this interlocutory appeal following entry of an order in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying their motion for summary judgment. The principal issue before us is whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity from Robert Pinter’s claims of false arrest, malicious prosecution, malicious abuse of process, discriminatory treatment, and denial of the right to free association.
I. Background 1
On October 10, 2008, Pinter, a 52-year-old gay male, stopped at Blue Door to pick up a video.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Matthews v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Pinter v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Shaheed v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Gaston v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Pollard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.