Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brathwaite

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1988No. 16-85-09013; CA A41212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment in which Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) seeks a declaration of its rights and responsibilities under two homeowner’s insurance policies issued to defendants Feher. Aetna appeals 1 from a trial court judgment which held that Aetna had a duty to defend and indemnify the Michael Feher estate (Feher) in a wrongful death action brought by the Christopher Brathwaite estate (Brathwaite), because Feher’s shooting of Brathwaite was not within the intentional act exclusions of the insurance policies. 2 The dispositive issue is whether the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. ScheiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lane Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federated Rural Electric InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API